Lancashire County Conservatives - Return to main page
Home | About Us | People | News | Events | Contact Us | Links | Blog | Photo Gallery | Children & Young People | Development Control | Adult Social Care & Health | Highways and Transport | Communities and Partnerships | Spokesmen | Working with Districts | Sustainable Development |

In this section
- Section Home
- Privacy Policy
- Get a postal vote
- Working with Districts


Archive
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007

RSS Feed Blog RSS feed


Search this siteSearch this site



Join our mailing listJoin our mailing list




RSS FeedsRSS Feeds

- News RSS
- Blog RSS
- Gallery RSS


Welcome to our Blog

The Members Blog is a forum for Conservative Councillors to raise issues and explain their individual points of view. The items are personal statement by Members; they do not necessarily represent the policy of the Conservative Group.


Thursday, 12 July, 2007
THE COUNCILLORS’ COMMISSION

RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR SUBMISSIONS OF EVIDENCE AND OPINION ON THE WORK OF THE COUNCILLORS’ COMMISSION

 

NB: The views expressed in this submission are those of the author and do not represent the views of the Lancashire County Conservative Group

 

Motivation and Perception

 

1.    In my experience, most Councillors are motivated by a genuine desire to serve their local community and improve the lot of the people they represent. Other motivations include a desire for status and prestige, the attractions of a part time role with some additional income, the need for something to do and the fact that one is part of a particular political/social net-work. For some it is a gateway to professional politics.

 

2.    Councillors as a class suffer from the low esteem in which politics and politicians are generally held, compounded by their relative anonymity and perceived ineffectiveness.

 

3.    Councillors who inter-act directly with their constituents and acquire a reputation for getting things done can achieve local recognition in their own right.

 

4.    Councillors need to be broadly in tune with the community they represent. The barriers are not so much cultural but social – in particular the competing claims of job, family, other interests and leisure activities.

 

5.    By promoting the concept of community activism and explaining that citizens are collectively responsible for the state of their neighbourhood.

 

Role, Support and Remuneration

 

Should Councillors continue to be volunteers, elected to represent their community on a part time basis and provide independent oversight of the activities of their authority or are we seeking to develop a new class of full time politicians who make their careers in local government and expect that to be their main professional activity?

 

This key question needs to be answered before addressing the others. Personally I incline to the traditional view but have severe doubts as to whether it is sustainable in the light of current expectations.

 

Routes to becoming a Councillor

 

1.    The principal constraint on political parties is lack of resources. This could be overcome by making money available to local political parties for the specific purpose of identifying and recruiting local candidates by qualified party agents. There would have to be clear ground rules and qualifications for the use of such grants including the use of open primaries for candidate selection.

 

2.    Local authorities could provide a standard information leaflet on the role and responsibilities of Councillors with contacts for local party organisations.

 

3.    See above

 

Legal barriers and incentives

 

These seem to me to be issues of secondary importance. This is not a matter for bureaucratic solutions!

 

Other

1.    The main problem facing Councillors is their perceived ineffectiveness. This is compounded by the proliferation of other agencies, voluntary and state sponsored who in the name of “partnership” are given equal status with elected members. We need to re-establish the primacy of the elected Councillor as the legitimate and accountable representative of the community and the natural interface between the citizen, the local authority and other public service providers.

 

2.    As part of the standard curriculum secondary schools and sixth form colleges should be required to run annual courses on local government and how it works including sessions with local councillors who should explain what they do and answer questions.

 

GOOD PRACTICE

Preston North East County Division is made up of extensive new housing estates running east from an older core area. There are two rapidly expanding business parks on the outer perimeter. Most households have two wage earners and are relatively prosperous though there are a number of pensioner couples and singles developments. The main issues are traffic congestion and parking – the infrastructure is inadequate to support the development, low level youth crime and environment – waste recycling, litter etc. There is an active community association but very little sense of community spirit or identity.

 

The Division is composed of two Preston City wards each of which has three district councillors. Once a week, except during August and holiday periods, alternately in each ward, we carry out walkabouts. These involve the County Councillor and districts councillors working as a team and last from 6.00 to 7.30. We walk through an area knocking on doors, introducing ourselves and asking if there are any problems or complaints that need dealing with. Problems are noted and systematically followed up with the appropriate authority. Politics are not mentioned unless raised by the respondent or during election periods. No literature is distributed but we leave calling cards with contact details.

 

The rule is that we are always prepared to spend time if people want to talk and that we focus on their concerns not our own. In an average evening we will cover 60/70 houses including outs and reckon to cover the whole division in three years. Over this period we will meet and talk to a substantial number of our electors. In addition to letters and ‘phone calls I regularly post details of problems raised during walkabouts and the action we have taken on my county council web site. This is gradually acquiring some salience as a source of information on local issues.

 

As a result of the walkabouts we have a stream of issues to tackle and in many cases are able over time to achieve positive results. We also have a very good idea about what is bothering people and are able to reflect this in our routine work as councillors and also explain to people why things can’t always be done in the way they wish. The reception is usually very positive and, only occasionally, are we sent away with a flea in our ear. It is quite rare for people to raise national political issues.

 

Two years ago we talent spotted a candidate to oppose a long serving Councillor in Garrison Ward. The person concerned was a senior nurse in her early forties, she lives locally has two teenage sons and has been active in the community association. Prior to the approach, she had no political involvement. Once spotted, we arranged for her to shadow us at local meetings and join us on our walkabouts as a full member of our team. She also took on extra tasks for the community association and by the time the elections came in May this year she was a recognisable figure in her own right and had a track record as a community representative having met numbers of people on the door step in that capacity. She was elected with a majority of over 1000 against and incumbent who had been in place for 16 years. She is already proving an active and committed councillor, the “training” has more than paid off.

 

 

Michael Welsh

County Councillor, Preston North East

Leader of the Conservative Group Lancashire County Council

Permalink

Friday, 23 March, 2007
Tony Jones' Blog

SPEECH TO FULL COUNCIL 22 FEBRUARY 2007

REGARDING HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE

 

 

At a meeting of the Overview & Scrutiny Committee on the 12 October 2005, road condition performance indicators were considered.

 

These showed an extremely worrying situation in Lancashire with a trend in annual decline of between 2% and 2.5% in the condition of the highways to no residual life in the road network.

 

In other words between 2% and 2.5% of the highways each year had no residual life.

 

We were advised by the Environment Directorate that they estimated a £12M per annum increase was required to arrest the decline.  That is to say £12M more a year was needed to be spent just to arrest the decline.  We were advised a further figure of £10M per annum making a total of £22M per annum extra was required for at least 10 years to arrest the decline and restore the network to an adequate condition. 

 

The Environment Directorate put this problem in perspective by saying that an increase of £12M per annum would give a total spend on highway maintenance which was still less in real terms than the average annual spend on highway maintenance from 1974 to 1994. 

 

In the year 1998 to 1999, £18.142M was spent on highway maintenance.  The projected expenditure for 2007/2008 is £26.213M.

 

The increase from the £18.142M in 1998/99 to £26.213M in 2007/08 is only an increase over that 10 year period of a little over £8M.

 

Whereas the report of October 2005 says we need to spend an additional sum of £12M annually just to stay still, and an additional £10M annually on top of the £12M to restore the network to an adequate condition.

 

 

At the meeting of 12 October 2005, Cty Cllr Martin indicated that monies would be taken from non-essential expenditure and dedicated to highway maintenance.  From the figures supplied by the Environment Directorate for 2005/06 2006/07 and 2007/08 there has been no evidence of any significant increase and indeed the expenditure in 2005/06 was actually 3% less than the previous year.

 

I understand that Lancashire County Council has received a 4 Star rating under the CPA assessment and that that includes the Environment Directorate and Highway Maintenance.  It is difficult to understand how this formal assessment can bear any relation to what is actually happening on the ground and the dire and deteriorating condition of our road network. 

 

 

It is just a pity this Government spends so many million pounds of public money on these assessment frameworks and the very expensive bureaucracy surrounding them and does not spend money on the professional engineers and staff and highway maintenance to save our road network from the deterioration that has taken place over many years and to bring our road network back to a sustainable and adequate condition.

Permalink

Sunday, 11 March, 2007
Malcolm Barron's Blog

Recycling

 

Despite many false claims made by others I am delighted to report that prompt action by my Tarleton colleagues and I, resulted in the scrutiny committee of Labour controlled LCC voting for a reprieve and review of the proposed closure of the Rufford recycling centre. We will continue to closely monitor the situation and will fight on your behalf to retain this valuable asset.

 

Permalink

Macolm Barron's Blog

Green Lane Link Road

 

We continue to seek funding from the County Council and elsewhere to establish what we consider to be the most affordable and viable solution to re-route HGV’s from our village roads

Permalink

Monday, 12 February, 2007
Michael Welsh

Sad Story from Savick

 

Preston's Lancashire Local was asked to approve a change to the opening hours for Savick Library on Fridays. The reason - young people congregating and drinking in the area have been bullying and intimidating staff and would be users, putting them in fear for their safety. In other words these young people have turned part of our City into a "No Go" area for ordinary citizens.

As shocking is the fact that as far as we could gather the authorities have no particular response to the problem other than early closing. If this behaviour goes unchecked it could easily spread to other parts of Preston including Fulwood and we must all - Police, Youth Workers, Schools, Parents, Neighbours - take responsibility for dealing with it. Passive reliance on the authorities is not enough, this is a threat to all of us.

You may be sure that Local members will follow events around Savick with close attention and concern.

Permalink

Sunday, 14 January, 2007
Tim Ashton

My views on the proposed closure of the County Information Centres

 

Many people have expressed their concern over the proposed closure of the Lancashire County Information Centre in Lytham.

 

I am totally opposed to this proposal to cut a front line service which has been operated by the County Council providing valuable information to visitors and local people alike.

 

Not only does the Lytham Centre face the axe but the Chorley and Clitheroe centres are being considered for closure as part of a drive to reduce the budget for 2006/07 and beyond. You may be aware that budget matters are for the full Council (all 84 members) to vote upon normally at the February meeting. However as the Labour group have a majority and run the Council by way of ‘the cabinet system’, in reality the labour budget is the one that succeeds the budget process.

 

The cabinet member for Adult and Community Services is Councillor Chris Cheetham who represents Skelmersdale and it is he who will make any recommendations for closure to the Full Council. I will pass any correspondence to him and the Council Officer responsible

 

You may be interested to know that during the budget process last year that the Labour group closed 11 libraries, cut the school uniform grant and changed the fresh meals on wheels to a frozen meal service. All these cuts were opposed by the Conservative group.

 

I sincerely hope that through my best endeavours I will be able to argue for the Lytham Centre to remain open and continue to provide such a valuable service, indeed I shall ask the Labour Group to make the necessary savings from back office costs!

 

 

 

 

Councillor Tim Ashton

Permalink

Promoted by Michael Welsh on behalf of Lancashire County Conservatives both at Lancashire County Conservatives County Hall Preston Lancashire PR1 8XJ Tel: 01772 533357 Fax: 01772 531315